On Fri, 16 Jun 2006 05:36:09 -0400, Anne Carle <acarle@munge.com>
wrote:
>Interesting...probably the majority of us who do medical transcription
>(sci.med.transcription) still use WP 5.1 because of its features and
>simplicity. It's a dynamite program!
I wonder if you people are still using the MT dictionary developed by
a gal I knew back in the early 90s.