|
Re: wma to mp3
de S.O. Meone 04/29/2006 06:48
<normanstrong@comcast.net> wrote:
> I don't think you lose much if you convert to a more compressed file. e.g.
> you probably will not hear much difference between a wav file converted to
> 64kb/s mp3, and a 192kb/s mp3 converted to 64kb/s.
MP3 and WMA use different algorithms for compression. Concersion from
one compression format to another involves a 2X loss of (different)
information.
S.O. Meone
| wma to mp3 | Myrto Kamari | |
| Re: wma to mp3 | the guy upstairs <.> | |
| Re: wma to mp3 | Markku V. | |
| Re: wma to mp3 | the guy upstairs <.> | |
| Re: wma to mp3 | Vic Dura | |
| Re: wma to mp3 | Thorsten Duhn | |
| Re: wma to mp3 | S.O. Meone | |
| Re: wma to mp3 | normanstrong | |
| | Re: wma to mp3 | S.O. Meone | |
| Re: wma to mp3 | Franklin | |
| Re: wma to mp3 | bizdakol | |
| Re: wma to mp3 | Thorsten Duhn |