In message <1256u1vj37kba67@corp.supernews.com>, John Corliss
<jcorliss@fake.invalid> writes
>Calling a person a NetCop is (IMO) akin to calling them a Nazi
Poppycock!
Oh; BTW, You're a wannabe netcop.
>So name calling will always cause me to start responding with a tone of
>disrespect towards the other party. Nobody likes to be called names.
Hypocrite!
>Nagware displays a screen that you must close. That's always been the
>definition of Nagware.
Evidence?
> IMO though, if something on the screen is obnoxious enough, it can
>rate the status of Nagware though.
Now you contradict yourself.
> I will continue to use the same signature file whether or not you like
>it.
Even though it's broken and dishonest?
>How about we refrain from name calling and try to keep this discussion
>on a more mature level?
Hypocrite!
>When I feel that I no longer wish to participate in a discussion
>because it's getting nowhere, I will always inform the other party that
>I'm no longer going to continue with it.
No, you (attempt to) declare it closed. That's not the same thing.
>The only reason you don't like it when I do so, is because you're the
>kind of person who erroneously believes that having the last word means
>that you "win".
You can't see what's wrong with the logic of your claim, can you?
>As for my signature file, Andy Mabbett *IS* a troll
Corliss, you are a liar.
>So is Doc and even worse, he uses sock puppets.
As have you.
>This, in my opinion, is the worst kind of troll. Both of these guys are
>newsgroup "stalkers" too (IMO).
You are a liar.
>The reason I post their names in my signature file is that I will not
>lose face when I don't respond to them because they are in my killfile.
You loose face all the time.
>*I* consider freeware to be software that's written to be free of any
>kind of price, monetary or otherwise.
Yes, *You* considered it so. This is not your newsgroup. much as you
seem to want it to be.
--
Andy Mabbett
Say "NO!" to compulsory ID Cards: <http://www.no2id.net/>