Re: Why does the definition of freeware need to be protected?
de Vrodok the Piglet lover 04/29/2006 10:33
Once Upon A Time (on Sat, 29 Apr 2006 20:49:33 +0100), in alt.comp.freeware,
Andy Mabbett <usenet200309@pigsonthewing.org.uk>, by way of Message-id
<mCOD5XFNN8UEFwuo@pigsonthewing.org.uk>, wrote:
>In message <12571bfp87prfc8@corp.supernews.com>, John Corliss
><jcorliss@fake.invalid> writes
>
>>This group is, at this point, the major determining force behind the
>>definition of freeware.
>
>Bullshit.
[FLUSH]
Why all the potty-mouth commentary? Does John irritate you _so_ much, that you
should pass along what irritation you feel for him to everyone else here?