|
Re: Vote results
de Susan Bugher 05/04/2006 01:52
Tony(UK) wrote:
> "John Corliss" <jcorliss@fake.invalid> wrote in message
> news:125h7g28sc3hhb0@corp.supernews.com...
>>Not worth the effort though. Susan runs the Pricelessware page and many
>>people will want to stay on her good side (as I knew before I asked for a
>>vote.) Taking this into consideration, the no side did better than I
>>expected.
>>
>>IMO, that she's allowed a toe to be inserted in the door is going to cause
>>problems for this group down the road. Had to happen eventually though.
> Oi! Right. Enough is enough, Corliss, you've wound me up now.
>
> How DARE you bring Susan's good name into this discussion. Was it to get a
> reaction? Well, you've got it.
<SNIP>
Whew! That was quite some rant Tony. :) I also feel that John C.'s
comments were out of line but John's opinions are John's opinions,
however mistaken, ;) and he doesn't often change them. Let's not go to
war over this. . .
Just for the record. . . IMO people voted the Nagware question
according to their personal convictions - those who think it was a
personality contest are mistaken. The Nagware "toe" has been in the door
for a long, long time (that's a fact, not an opinion).
End of topic (I hope). . .
Susan
--
Posted to alt.comp.freeware
Search alt.comp.freeware (or read it online):
http://www.google.com/advanced_group_search?q=+group:alt.comp.freeware
Pricelessware & ACF: http://www.pricelesswarehome.org
Pricelessware: http://www.pricelessware.org (not maintained)