|
Re: Vote results
de Aaron 05/09/2006 11:22
John Fitzsimons <DELETEucwubqf02@sneakemail.com> wrote in
news:45us52hd6ao97244r4ejo36o9bqm7cknct@4ax.com:
> On 6 May 2006 23:04:31 +0200, Aaron
> <chessnntps.20.greentack@spamgourmet.com> wrote:
>
> < snip >
>
>>Ditto for dozens of other posters, why is it that always JC is the one
>>in the middle?
>
> < snip >
>
> Because he has a lot of enemies.
And why is that? Aren't there many people like you, who have almost the
same goals and the same beliefs? Why is it then that he is the only one
getting into all this trouble, causing all this racket?
The spammers don't like him. The
> scammers don't like him. The shareware authors don't like him. The
> commercial authors don't like him. The top posters don't like him.
> The no editing "me too" posters don't like him. The spyware authors
> don't like him etc. etc.
Some of this is no doubt true, but it's not sufficient I think to explain
why he is singled out. IMHO JC unlike some of the other posters who in
theory play the same role, clearly lacks self control, tact and the
ability to keep a level head.
I submit that a lot of this friction is not necessary it's the way JC
goes about it, that i causing a lot of the problem.
That is why people enjoy playing with him , teasing him, just waiting for
him to explode.
Nobody would borther to do that with Q, or to a certain extent you, it
would be pointless.
> Because he tends to point out what they are doing. With people like
> JC out of the way life would be much easier for the idiots/low life
> mentioned above.
I beg to differ, you make it sound like JC is the only one in this
newsgroup who is supporting the strict definition of freeware. Many
others do, they just deal with it with more tact.
Take this recent incident, if JC wasn't around, what do you think would
have happened? We would all support adware and nagware? LOL.
Inviato da X-Privat.Org - Registrazione gratuita http://www.x-privat.org/join.php