Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote in
news:49jr3217buspckqsj580s3csmt5htq4vum@4ax.com:
> What do you have against running Windows to back up Windows, other
> than, maybe, purity?
Convenience, mostly. I do not have an R-CD or a RW-CD cd -- honest.
So it is easier to boot linuz or dos from a floppy than boot a second
windows. I admit, it seems conceptually wierd to me for a recovery or
backup tool designed to help rejewvenate an ailing windows, requires
an original or copy of windows to be already working, to run the
application itself.
Call me crazy, but there are plenty of recovery tools that run fine under a
simple emergency OS like dos; why not make backup tools that do also?
> Whatever you keep around, it's probably going to be a bootable CD - so
> what's the difference what OS it boots to?
See above. I have an ordinary CD only that I can not write to, so for me
my emergency media are floppies, another hard disk, or another partition on
my primary disk.
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----